An LPG Client recently requested some help dealing with some objections from local clients that they were trying to sell onto their local websites and the clients were claiming that they didn't need a local site as they can access it by Google AdWords and Facebook advertising and that is all they need. There is not a medium that does not have challenges or negatives and the two of these platforms have their fair share. Facebook has about 54% of the population with profiles and not all are frequent viewers, only 20% of your graphic ad can have text which can be challenging to tell the story or generate a call to action while Google Adwords locations are being completely deleted by some premium sites while most placements are below the fold and banner ads on the network have a relatively low click through rate when compared to local portals with premium placements according to Smart Insights...
"Display Ad CTR benchmarks - March 2017 update
The best source for current benchmarks is Doubleclick (the display advertising arm of Google) who have this regularly updated interactive Display Benchmarking tool as part of Think Insights. You can select by country, sector and ad format to create your own benchmarks. Here's our summary of current global Ad CTRs:
1. Overall Display Ad CTRs
Across all ad formats and placements Ad CTR is just 0.05%
So, this is just than 5 clicks per 10000 impressions showing the difficulty of driving direct response from online display or banner ads.
While this is a really low CTR however you look at it, cross media optimisation research we see that online ads do help increase brand awareness and purchase intent, particularly when combined with offline media.
We also see much higher CTRs online for other online ad formats like Google AdWords and Facebook - these can exceed 1%, so are more effective in driving volume and also typically have higher intent, so conversion rates are higher.
The most recent data from November when we updated this compilation shows that previous rich media expandable rates were higher making the average higher, but the more typical image or Flash in-page ad is similar to a year ago.
2. Rich media CTRs
Rich media Ad CTR is 0.1%
Across standard and rich media, this shows an ad clickthrough rate of 0.14% which is more realistic estimate if ads will be placed on the fold. For Smart Insights advertisers we offer an MPU in the right sidebar above-the-fold and this has a typical CTR of 0.15 to 0.22% depending on the creative and content asset on offer.
3. Ad CTR trends
This chart, also from Google-Doubleclick shows that the 0.1% CTR has been an average for some time although the recent fluctuations cast doubt on the data accuracy.
For anyone researching trends in display advertising in different countries or sectors you could try the Doubleclick Ad Research page - these reports don't tend to be updated so frequently though.
4. Comparison of display, search (AdWords) and social ads CTRs
This Q3 2015 comparison of average online media clickthrough rates from Marin is useful for modelling the response of digital media for top-level budgets.
These Facebook Ad CTRs for different types of ad formats are taken from a test run by Smart Insights contributor Marie Page. They show that by using targeting in Facebook it's possible to improve on general Internet ad clickthough rates.
This is historic data for reference - for the latest use the interactive Display benchmarking tool.
Region | Overall Click-through Rate Percent (%) |
North America | |
Canada | 0.09% |
United States | 0.10% |
EMEA | |
Austria | 0.11% |
Belgium | 0.13% |
Denmark | 0.12% |
Finland | 0.05% |
France | 0.12% |
Germany | 0.11% |
Greece | 0.17% |
Ireland | 0.10% |
Italy | 0.10% |
Luxembourg | 0.09% |
Netherlands | 0.14% |
Norway | 0.11% |
Spain | 0.12% |
Sweden | 0.08% |
Switzerland | 0.12% |
United Arab Emirates | 0.18% |
United Kingdom | 0.07% |
JAPAC | |
Australia | 0.07% |
China | 0.12% |
Hong Kong | 0.17% |
India | 0.18% |
Malaysia | 0.30% |
Singapore | 0.19% |
Source: DoubleClick for Advertisers, a cross section of regions, January and December 2009, Published July 2010
For latest data see Doubleclick Display Ad Benchmark Statistics.
Variation in online ad Clickthrough Rates by ad format
Ad clickthrough rate naturally varies according to placement (position on screen) and ad format (shape and size). The traditional full-banner performs very poorly compared to skyscrapers, the ubiquitous medium rectangle and the newer large rectangle format.
Interaction rates differ for different ad formats in a similar way to ad formats.
Interaction rate definition:
Interactions are defined as the user does one or more of the following:
Wordstream have posted an interesting analysis comparing Facebook and Twitter. It's generally known that Facebook has low CTRs because ad units are not that prominent - it's similar with LinkedIn. Although this is changing as more prominent ad units are created, particularly on mobile.
You can read the full analysis from Larry Kim on Facebook vs Twitter CTRs on Wordstream which includes a wider analysis of the importance of their advertising including mobile.
There is also newer 2017 research Facebook Ad CTR from WordStream's Facebook advertising customers showing that across sectors clickthrough rates (CTRs) vary from around 0.5% through to 1.6%.
These statistics are courtesy of the Adobe Digital Index reports, published annually for their customers across 200 billion site visits.
Of course, these figures are averages and in reality, CTRs tend to be higher for brand searches.
Viewability is another issue for advertisers to consider when evaluating online ad effectiveness as measured by clickthrough rates. Ad blocking also has an impact since ad blockers have increased in popularity across countries and demographics, accounting for 35% of ads in some countries.
Viewability refers to the percentage of ads in a campaign or on a publisher site that are potentially available for clickthrough. Just 44.9% of all ads are clickable according to Google-published viewability data since ads may be below the fold and users do not scroll to see them. This varies across publisher and content category.
Given the impact of viewability and ad blocking on online ad clickthrough rates you can see that there are moves in the industry to only charge for viewable ads, which with increasing options for native advertising will potentially improve the effectiveness of ads."
Related Categories